This probably reads like Serena Williams' resume. In fact it's the start to the season of current world #4 Agnieszka Radwanska, who has taken the unorthodox route of eschewing the seed-heavy tournaments at the beginning of the year in favour of some more guaranteed trophy moments in the less well attended events.
![]() |
| 2 titles already for Radwanska this year |
That player was Li Na, who was also on an unbeaten run for 2013 having picked up tournament accolades in Shenzhen the week previously. Meeting at the semi-final stage the match was billed as a battle of the 100%-ers, but when it began, with a prolonged opening service game from the Chinese player, it was Radwanska who seized the initiative, breaking from the outset and maintaining the pressure to progress to the final comfortably 61 64, albeit needing 7 match points before she closed out the last game. Her victory stemmed from her consistent, but deeply patient gameplan, seeing her hit just 3 winners to Li Na's 28, but making only 15 unforced errors compare to the #4 seed's 40. It was a turnaround from 2012 when Li Na had dispatched the Pole in all three of their hard court meetings without the loss of a set.
In the final Radwanska was to meet a resurgent Dominika Cibulkova who, in addition to dispatching Kvitova and Errani from the competition, had the previous day dominated the decidedly flat-looking second seed Angelique Kerber, the German perhaps suffering from the sweltering Sydney heat - reportedly tipping 40 degrees at times. Playing some fast and precise tennis, the diminutive Slovak irked her semi-final opponent into some rushed strokes, before fistpumping her way to the final. Unfortunately, the Radwanska steadiness demolished the Slovak's chances, taking the match with the first double bagel of 2013 - 60 60. It was a dominant display that saw Radwanska absorb Cibulkova's superior firepower with her defensive sensibilities, and continually chase down one extra ball to frustrate her opponent into an error.
Whether the triumvirate at the top of the game will feel threatened going into the Australian Open by Radwanska's perfect display is still up for debate, they will perhaps register an increased awareness of her placing within the draw. For although the Pole is ranked #4 in the world and with 3 titles to her name in 2012 and 2 already for 2013, her Slam record is less impressive. Just a solitary final appearance sits above a myriad of lukewarm campaigns that have seen her consistently peak around the quarter or fourth round stage. Indeed, last year's Wimbledon final where she took Serena Williams to three sets, was as unexpected in its unfolding as it was for Radwanska's presence as Williams' opponent.
What is unarguable though, is that Radwanska is the highest ranked player in the WTA who has yet to lift a Grand Slam trophy, a position similar to that which Andy Murray had found himself in for a number of years in the ATP. However, while Murray's inadequacies were predominantly attributed to the three men above him who had dominated the tour for the past 5 years, Radwanska's may be better described as shortcomings within her style. Although the best at defensive play and with a solid returning game facilitated by perhaps the most tactically sound, chess-match mind in the WTA at the moment, if her opponent is able to raise their power game to a consistently precise level (Williams and Azarenka particularly), Radwanska is liable to crumble. Indeed, even outside of the top three should someone lower in the rankings such as Li Na, or Kvitova or even Stosur be playing with the effortless perfection that took them to their maiden Slam titles, Radwanska would also come out of the contest as the second best player.
Therefore, a better comparison for the Radwanska conundrum would be Caroline Wozniacki rather than Andy Murray. The Dane was frequently criticised for holding the #1 ranking for over a year, but with only 1 Slam final appearance and no Slam title to her name. Radwanska, who has been as high as #2 in the WTA rankings, has followed a similar biography, winning at Premier and Mandatory level, but never graduating to sustained success in the four majors. And although she may be the player with the best record in 2013, it is unlikely that she will be considered by too many to be the player to watch at the upcoming Australian Open. The goals for Radwanska's 2013 should be to progress beyond the quarter final at all of the four majors (in line with her ranking) and ultimately to win one of the titles. However, the latter is a tall ask considering the women above her, but it is an even taller ask if she fails to advance her game to a more aggressive level. Being able to beat 3 other top 10 players including 2 of those in the top 3 in succession during a tournament would rely on a series of lacklustre and out-of-character performances from her opponents, for at the moment, she may be able to win this way against one seed, but may not sustain it over the course of a full-strength tournament.
For Radwanska, a little bit of luck may be needed to see her through to her second Slam final and ultimately a major tournament trophy moment. And if the victory doesn't come within the year, she could stand to be the player on tour with the best record at the less-critical events, but ultimately as slamless as Caroline Wozniacki throughout 2013.

4 comments:
Radwanska actually reminds me more of David Ferrer who, like her, is one of the most consistent players on tour and keeps on playing at smaller tournaments even when all the other top players are already practicing in Melbourne. He also has a great defensive game that suffers from a lack of offensive power and seems to move through draws as quietly and stealthily as the Ninja until he inevitably falls to a top 3 player.
And, much like Radwanska, you get the feeling that as likeable and hard-working as he is, he'd need a lot of luck or really poor performances from the top trio to win a Slam. (Granted, he's made deeper Slam runs than Radwanska, but he hasn't made a final like she has, so it kinda evens out there.)
Hi Lotus Cloud.
Yep - the parallels with Ferrer are definitely there to be made.
With Ferrer I find that the best way that his chances can be summed up are by looking at the WTF last November.
Ferrer defeated 2 of his opponents - Tipsarevic & Del Potro, but lost to Federer - which ordinarily would have been enough to see him through to the semis. However, one of the men he beat - Del Potro - beat Federer and Ferrer was shunted into 3rd place in the group on a countback.
It was unlucky for Ferrer, but highlighted the a sense that the bigger the event, the more likely that a Del Potro, a Berdych, or a Tsonga (or for Radwanska: a Li Na or a Kvitova for example) may pull out the kind of offensive performance that can topple the big players. Something that Ferrer and Radwanska are largely unable to do. And until they do work out the game plan to consistently win against those players - they will always be nearly and never be actually.
It is a great way to introduce Serena. Congratulations to her to start the season like that.
Yeah - Radwanska started the season well, but I really don't see her sustaining it. Williams was unfortunate to struggle with an injury in Melbourne - much will be answered for her when she schedules her comeback and what she achieves when she does.
Post a Comment